Jacob Walker and Roberto Jaimes
ABSTRACTION IS NOT
1) Under harmful dichotomy abstraction is said to be described in terms of words, but could one say that abstraction can be described in the physical form or art and design?
2) Is abstraction possible without precedent?
3) What is the difference between perception and abstraction?
Does the idea of harmful dichotomy enrich abstraction or cloud it?
4) If a sound is not an abstraction to a blind man, how can a blind man abstract sound?
How can extension presuppose intension? How can intension presuppose extension?
5) James describes confusion as a lapse into an undiscriminating state, where the author argues it is a result of special conditions.
Are these conditioning ideas?
Is there a more valid explanation?
6) Does fusion create or facilitate confusion?
7) If abstraction can be understood as, "A smaller quantity containing the virtue or power of a greater," How can we know if there is still too large or too small a sample to accurately abstract an entity?
8) Do the three difficulties of simply removing elements clarify integrated concepts, or does it simply tell you what a concept is not?
Is it an effective explanation? Can you confidently abstract?
1) What is the difference between genus and differentia?
2) What makes a concept generative?
How do we know a concept is generative?
3) How can concepts be altered to accommodate qualitative differences?
Are qualitative differences always important for abstraction?
4) What comes first, A type or a container?
Can they be reversed? Does on inform the other?
Is the process of generating containers and types happen sequentially?
5)How can we make the distinction between a generality that is intended and a generality that is perceived?
6) What is a concept? How do we know when something has become a concept?
7) How do dynamic concepts allow for a lack of physical continuity?
8) What is generalization? How does it relate to abstraction?