1)
“Worldlike sparklines should often be embedded
in text and tables, which provide a helpful context for interpreting otherwise
free- floating sparklines” (49). Do sparklines need to be accompanied with text
for understanding to be attained?
For instance, if one’s heartrate
were to be monitored and captured graphically from before one’s beginning of
life to after death, could that be understood visually without text?
2)
In the same instance of heart rate monitoring,
can sparklines be understood auditorily? Can music be described as auditory
sparklines?
3)
Moving away from visual and auditory
perceptions, can sparklines be understood tactilely?
4)
Christopher Wilmarth’s “Gift of the Bridge” (84)
describes the degradation of his birthday card. In architecture, we can see not only the
effects of erosion and the changing climate but also material degradation as an
indexing of environmental change through time. How/Should can design be done to
capture this effectively?
5)
In the cyclogram narrative of the Salyut 6 space
flight, we see various amounts of information captured as once. Does presenting
this vast amount of information at once mitigate the understanding of critical
events as opposed to seeing more detailed day or week by week events shown separately?
(See World Map)
No comments:
Post a Comment