1. In "How to Do a Thesis: Practice Models as Instigators for Academic Theses", do you agree with Sergio's distaste for how a thesis is approached? Are students limited by the way architecture is taught?
2. Sergio describes some of Diller and Scofidio's work as simply {{{{}}Theses}}. Can Theses stand on its own as a mode of operation?
3. When reading through this paper, did any method of architectural practice stand out to you? If so, why?
4. In the introduction to Practice vs. Project", Stan Allen says this about theory, "Detached from the operational site of technique, theory stakes a claim on a world of concepts uncontaminated by real world contingencies". Does this mean that when working in the "real world", theory falls apart? What is theory's value to architectural practice?
5. Stan Allen, "Architecture, I want to say right from the beginning, is a material, and not a discursive practice". Why is he so adamant that architecture is not a discursive practice? Do you agree?
1 comment:
Week 11
6. Sergio states
Post a Comment